The views expressed in this blog are those of the owner and do not reflect the views or opinions of the owner’s employer. All content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. This policy is subject to change at any time. The owner is not an attorney, and nothing posted on this site should be construed as legal advice. Litigation Support Tip of the Night does not provide confirmation that any e-discovery technique or conduct is compliant with legal, regulatory, contractual or ethical requirements.
SCOTUS to Rule on Whether Unauthorized Access to Computer Data Is a Federal Crime
Van Buren v. United States, No. 19-783 (U.S. filed Dec. 18, 2019), is a case in which the Petitioner has asked the Supreme Court of the United States to rule on whether or not a person who is authorized to access information on a computer for certain purposes violates the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act if the same information is accessed for an unauthorized purpose. Van Buren requests that the Court reverse the judgment of the 11th Circuit that the Act should be interpreted broadly as covering access to information beyond stated use restrictions. The petitioner's brief points out that any access on a computer to information which violates a business's policies; a website's terms of service; or other restrictions would constitute a federal crime. Van Buren maintains that even if the government states it will not prosecute all violations of the Act, the Court should rule that section 1030 of the Act only concerns unauthorized computer hacking. Violations of private rules or state laws about the use of computer data should not be federal crimes.
While employed as a police officer, Van Buren looked up a license plate number in a database that he was authorized to use as part of his regular duties in exchange for $5,000.
The reply brief has been filed in this case, and it has been circulated to the Court for consideration at a conference. I will post about the decision when it is published.