The views expressed in this blog are those of the owner and do not reflect the views or opinions of the owner’s employer. All content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. This policy is subject to change at any time. The owner is not an attorney, and nothing posted on this site should be construed as legal advice. Litigation Support Tip of the Night does not provide confirmation that any e-discovery technique or conduct is compliant with legal, regulatory, contractual or ethical requirements.
Featured on the ACEDS blog.
Follow me on Twitter and see How-To Videos on my YouTube channel.
New tips for paralegals and litigation support profesionals are posted to this site each night. Click on the blog headings for better detail.
D.N.M.: Preservation Order Requires Extreme Caution In iPhone Data Transfers
March 6, 2020
Yesterday, in Ellis v. Hobbs Police Dep't, No. 17‐1011 KWR/GBW, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37328 (D.N.M. Mar. 4, 2020), Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Warmuth ruled that the Plaintiff be prohibited from introducing any evidence of audio recordings from his iPhone (except for impeachment), but declined to dismiss the case. In this employment discrimination suit, Ellis had used his iPhone 6 to record conversations he had in his workplace, but failed to produce all recordings made on the phone to the Defendant. Ellis subsequently gave his iPhone to his daughter and transferred the data on this phone to a new iPhone 8. After a preservation order was issued to the data on the phone, the data on the iPhone 6 was transferred at a Verizon store to a new iPhone 7 for the Plaintiff's daughter. The technician at the store assured Ellis that no data would be lost.
The Court concluded that data on the iPhone 6 was destroyed by a factory reset, and the treatment of the phone had been reckless. Ellis's failure to understand the nature of data transfer was no excuse. "]T]his ignorance was all the more reason to exercise extreme caution in doing anything that might alter the information stored on the phone. Mr. Ellis himself did not know whether the data that Defendants sought existed on the iPhone 6, and he was bound to act accordingly by preserving whatever data remained. He did not take reasonable steps to do so. The fact that any deleted audio recordings would not have been helpful or relevant to the case is immaterial under the language of the Court's preservation order, which directed Mr. Ellis to preserve 'any . . . file/data associated with [any recording] app.'" Id. at *20-21.