top of page

LITIGATION SUPPORT TIP OF THE NIGHT

The views expressed in this blog are those of the owner and do not reflect the views or opinions of the owner’s employer. All content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. This policy is subject to change at any time. The owner is not an attorney, and nothing posted on this site should be construed as legal advice. Litigation Support Tip of the Night does not provide confirmation that any e-discovery technique or conduct is compliant with legal, regulatory, contractual or ethical requirements.

See my post on Running Regex Searches With a Grep Utility on the ILTA litigation support blog.

New tips for paralegals and litigation support profesionals are posted to this site each week. Click on the blog headings for better detail.

See How-To Videos on my YouTube channel.

- Oct 5, 2019

Court rejects inquiry into doc review process

Last year Judge Colleen Kolkar-Kotelly issued a decision, In re Domestic Airline Travel Antitrust Litig., 2018 WL 4441507 (D.D.C. 2018) granting the Plaintiffs’ motion to extend the fact discovery deadline. The Plaintiffs contended that they needed more time to complete their document review and asked that previously scheduled depisitions be postponed. The Court rejected the Defendants’ request for information about the document review. “[T]he Court finds it unnecessary to require Plaintiffs to produce a list of attorneys working on this matter, or to engage in any additional review of monthly time reports.”. Id. at 6.