The views expressed in this blog are those of the owner and do not reflect the views or opinions of the owner’s employer. All content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. This policy is subject to change at any time. The owner is not an attorney, and nothing posted on this site should be construed as legal advice. Litigation Support Tip of the Night does not provide confirmation that any e-discovery technique or conduct is compliant with legal, regulatory, contractual or ethical requirements.
Featured on the ACEDS blog.
Follow me on Twitter and see How-To Videos on my YouTube channel.
New tips for paralegals and litigation support profesionals are posted to this site each night. Click on the blog headings for better detail.
Attorneys have been using technology to send business communications for far longer than computers and emails have been around. The Martindale Directory of 1900 contains a record of how lawyers of the Gilded Age used the technology of the day to efficiently send messages about business transactions. At the beginning of the directory is a list of cipher codes used in telegrams. Presumably, these codes allowed lawyers and their clients to communicate with a measure of confidentiality and for a cheaper per letter/word cost.
If a client sent a telegram to an attorney using the word, 'GYMNAST' the message would be, 'Have we power to arrest the party named below on the facts as stated to you?' The code HEDONIC was a direction by an attorney meaning, "Send at once full name of each member of your firm, or if you are corporation, give name of State in which you were incorporated. This we need in matter of your claim against . . .". '