Azure vs. COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic has seen a huge increase demand for cloud services. Microsoft posted a report on Saturday, which shows that demand for Azure cloud services has increased by 775% in areas effected by orders requiring social distancing. Usage of Windows virtual desktops has tripled. According to Microsoft, "we have not had any significant service disruptions."

In this post, Microsoft tacitly acknowledges that Xbox Live may adversely impact Azure services. So, it may be best to try to get work done after the kids have gone to bed.

Microsoft is apparently leaning on internet service providers to, "reduce bandwidth from video sources" during the workday. So apparently Microsoft is leaning on ISPs to cut off Hulu and Netflix to discourage slacking off in this work-from-era, and help eliminate network lag on remote business networks.

Keep in mind this period from March 2020 to ???? when conducting electronic discovery in the future and remember to account for the increase in cloud service usage.

Quarter Inch Cartridge

Quarter Inch Cartridges (QIC) are an old form of tape storage in use since the 1970s, which you may still come across during electronic discovery.

In may be necessary to rewind a QIC cartridge from beginning to end in order to get it to function properly. Drives used to access QIC cartridges that use a SCSI cable should have a retension command you can use.

Quarter Inch Cartridges can range in size from 20 MB to 40 GB. Mini-QICs, QIC-40s and QIC-80s can be accessed with a standard floppy drive.

Model Rule 3.3 and Electronic Discovery

The American Bar Association's Model Rule 3.3 imposes a duty of candor on attorneys requiring them to, "offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer, the lawyer’s client, or a witness called by the lawyer, has offered material evidence and the lawyer comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures, including, if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal."

Rule 3.3 is relevant to electronic discovery with respect to a counsel's discussion of his or her client's ability to locate electronically stored information; the thoroughness of a search performed by a client of its network data; and contents of electronic productions. See a post on the ABA's site here.

Obligations under Rule 3.3 may override an attorney's duty to protect the confidentiality of a client's data.

A decision by Judge Joy Flowers Conti of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania quoted Rule 3.3 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct, "failure to make a disclosure is the equivalent of an affirmative misrepresentation." Hohider v. UPS, 257 F.R.D. 80, 82 (W.D. Pa. 2009). Judge Conti faulted the Defendant for failing to be candid with her about its preservation. "For example, defendant's counsel wrote a letter to plaintiffs' counsel in 2005 stating that defendant was 'in the process of placing a 'Hold,' as that term is defined in the UPS Records Manual, on all categories of documents requested by Plaintiffs in the litigation.' (J. Culleiton letter to C. Bagin at 3-4, May 3, 2005.) It was also represented to plaintiffs' counsel that defendant was 'even going a step further and disseminating a memorandum to applicable managers throughout the Company which describes the litigation and further details the records that are to be held from destruction.' (Id.) Defendant, however, did not issue the hold at that time, did not disseminate the hold memorandum, and it did not advise plaintiffs of its failure to do so. " Id.