The views expressed in this blog are those of the owner and do not reflect the views or opinions of the owner’s employer. All content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. This policy is subject to change at any time. The owner is not an attorney, and nothing posted on this site should be construed as legal advice. Litigation Support Tip of the Night does not provide confirmation that any e-discovery technique or conduct is compliant with legal, regulatory, contractual or ethical requirements.
New tips for paralegals and litigation support profesionals are posted to this site each week. Click on the blog headings for better detail.
Avenir Light is a clean and stylish font favored by designers. It's easy on the eyes and a great go to font for titles, paragraphs & more.
Dec 13, 2020
Rhode Island Makes It Easier to Get an Expert's Documents
Paralegals often spend a lot of time tracking down materials cited in expert reports. In addition to produced documents and deposition testimony taken in the case the report is prepared for, experts often also rely on other documentation which is difficult to locate if it is indeed publicly available. Four years ago, the Supreme Court of Rhode Island issued a decision, Cashman Equip. Corp. v. Cardi Corp., 139 A.3d 379 (R.I. 2016), which found that a lower court correctly denied a motion to compel all documents considered by an expert in his written opinion. The Court concluded that, "Our review of the language of Rule 26(b)(4)(A) leads us to the ineluctable conclusion that that rule is indeed clear and unambiguous . . . It does not provide for the disclosure of documents. " Id. at *382-83. Rule 26 had only specified that interrogatories can be submitted regarding expert witnesses, and that expert witness can be deposed. The Court noted its strong policy in favor of safeguarding the work product of expert witnesses.
Thursday, an order was issued amending Rule 26(b)(4)(A) to include the following, "A party may, through a request for production pursuant to Rule 34, a request attached to a notice of deposition pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5), or subpoena duces tecum pursuant to Rule 45, require any other party to produce all documents and materials relied upon by a person whom the other party expects to call as an expert witness at trial in formulating that expert's opinion(s). If documents and materials are requested, the procedures of Rules 34 and 45, respectively, shall apply to the request." In re Amendments to the Superior Court Rules of Civil Procedure, 2020 R.I. LEXIS 74, at *4-5 (Dec. 10, 2020).
In Rhode Island the Rules of Civil Procedure are amended when a majority of the members of the Rhode Island Superior Court make a recommendation to the Rhode Island Supreme Court that the Supreme Court approves.