The views expressed in this blog are those of the owner and do not reflect the views or opinions of the owner’s employer. All content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. This policy is subject to change at any time. The owner is not an attorney, and nothing posted on this site should be construed as legal advice. Litigation Support Tip of the Night does not provide confirmation that any e-discovery technique or conduct is compliant with legal, regulatory, contractual or ethical requirements.
Featured on the ACEDS blog.
Follow me on Twitter and see How-To Videos on my YouTube channel.
New tips for paralegals and litigation support profesionals are posted to this site each night. Click on the blog headings for better detail.
Two days ago, in Murphy v. Piper, No. 16-2623, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205750 (D. Minn.), the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, reviewed a decision by Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson on search terms to be used for discovery, and the temporal scope of the search. The court concluded that the information was relevant and that responding to discovery in the date range would not be undue burden. Judge Donovan W. Frank noted that, "the demonstrated relevance of each of Plaintiffs' proposed search terms and Defendant's failure to adequately support her claimed burden in utilizing those search terms."
The court also upheld the Magistrate Judge's decision to refuse to approve a motion to premptively preclude the discovery of privileged documents. The opinion states that, "the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's conclusion that any claimed privilege with respect to particular discovery requests can be addressed through the parties' privilege logs and, if necessary, motion practice to resolve a dispute."