top of page

Early Version of the EDRM


When it was first introduced in 2005 the Electronic Discovery Reference Model had a different structure than it does today. While the nine stages in the familiar version of today were all present (with 'Information Governance' being termed 'Records Retention'), there was a tenth stage missing from the current model.

A second 'Analysis' stage appears between Production and Presentation. The EDRM is an iterative process, and the in-depth description of the model makes clear that Analysis is to be performed in all phases of electronic discovery. However the positioning of Analysis after Review in the modern model emphasizes tasks such as clustering documents or threading emails for reviewers; determining what categories of documents should be included in e-discovery; and running effective searches to reduce the ESI to be reviewed and identify privileged data.

Analysis can have another meaning though. For those of us who perform litigation support at law firms much of the work involves helping attorneys review documents after they have been produced. Months and often years will past between the discovery deadline and the trial where Presentation takes places. Attorneys need help searching for through produced data and understanding its import. Email meta data doesn't always include the names of all recipients in a message thread, and addresses can be obscured in X.400 format. The litigation support analyst can structure a series of searches that goes beyond standard TO/FROM/CC/BCC field searches. Produced data that will show trends in a business over a date range may be split between thousands of reports or spreadsheets. An litigation support professional can prepare a master index running Regex searches on extracted text or employing VBA code to merge multiple spreadsheets. Production metadata can be analyzed to determine if data received from particular custodians has omitted relevant material. Working with production sets often involves far more than tagging hot documents.


Recent Posts

See All
Hold and Data Preservation Notices

The 2021 edition of the Thomson Reuters Electronic Discovery and Records and Information Management Guide provides checklists for legal...

 
 

Sean O'Shea has more than 20 years of experience in the litigation support field with major law firms in New York and San Francisco.   He is an ACEDS Certified eDiscovery Specialist and a Relativity Certified Administrator.

​

The views expressed in this blog are those of the owner and do not reflect the views or opinions of the owner’s employer.

​

If you have a question or comment about this blog, please make a submission using the form to the right. 

Your details were sent successfully!

© 2015 by Sean O'Shea . Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page