The views expressed in this blog are those of the owner and do not reflect the views or opinions of the owner’s employer. All content provided on this blog is for informational purposes only. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site. The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information. This policy is subject to change at any time. The owner is not an attorney, and nothing posted on this site should be construed as legal advice. Litigation Support Tip of the Night does not provide confirmation that any e-discovery technique or conduct is compliant with legal, regulatory, contractual or ethical requirements.
Featured on the ACEDS blog.
Follow me on Twitter and see How-To Videos on my YouTube channel.
New tips for paralegals and litigation support profesionals are posted to this site each night. Click on the blog headings for better detail.
As I've noted on my blog before, while predictive coding, or Technology Assisted Review, is being widely touted in the electronic discovery world, there is a lot of evidence indicating that firms and clients are not rushing to adopt this review software which has been available for a few years now. (see the August 20 postabout Judge Conti's observations on the slow adoption of predictive coding she sees in cases before the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania).